World Health Organisation, World Economic Forum and United Nations...
'Is a pandemic preparedness treaty necessary?'
Let it be remembered there is a Hippocratic oath that has served the medical establishment millennia.
First rule of medicine
'First do no harm' and Baroness Cumberledge provided a report in 2020 'First do no harm' in which put a flood light on victims of primodos, sodium valproate and medical mesh...
'This must never happen again', was the resounding statement by various UK MP's who attended to the matters that were exposed by the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices safety review!
Well I believe this has happened again via the unnecessary lockdowns, masks, anti-social distancing and an experimental, unlicensed injectable noted as a vaccine called covid-19, unnecessary harm, injury and loss has been inflicted upon people internationally; deliberate, on purpose, intentional.
There is a need to consider the question 'Is a pandemic preparedness treaty necessary?'
In a word no and I will give my opinion on the matter and share links to other websites and organisations that I found really helpful in clearing my mind and making a rational, informed choice on the matter.
Background
Simon Dolan and the attempt of Judicial Review makes compelling reading. The man challenged the Government and the Judiciary sided against the people and took the part of the Government who it is now known have committed types of crimes against the British people.
In 2020 I came upon UK Column News. The reporting is backed by evidence which is provided in show notes. There now have a Health Correspondent, retired nurse with a wealth of knowledge, Debi Evans. The Column covers all manner of topics vital to people of the United Kingdom of Great Britain with experts in various locales of the world. During the previous two years there have been numerous articles, interviews, and participation in The Corona Virus Committee, The Grand Jury and more recently the International Criminal Investigative Committee, headed by Reiner Fuellmich.
In 2021 I was introduced, (not personally but through internet/youtube) Anna de Buiserette. This lady is a qualified English Lawyer with a specialism in employment law however a C.V. demonstrates a vast range of qualities and experiences. Anna has travelled around the country teaching people about their rights, our law and also set up the campaign website 'informed consent'. More profoundly Anna has liaised with other legal professionals to investigate and analyse data in relation to the Covid-19 scandal also referred to as a plandemic.
Dr Reiner Fuellmich, noted earlier, has provided ground breaking information, though the The Corona Virus Committee, The Grand Jury and more recently the International Criminal Investigative Committee. He "is an international lawyer with success in suing large, fraudulent corporations like Volkswagen and Deutche Bank".
Dr Vernon Coleman, Professor Delores Cahill and many more have provided valuable information over the past, almost three years, since flatten the curve was introduced! Dr Coleman was sharing valuable and essential information, which a Dr is incumbent to do to ensure informed consent and alert people to the depopulation programme that has continued to roll out, through youtube videos that were censored and removed by youtube no doubt to protect the people and patients!
Kate Shemirani is a qualified nurse with advanced training in prescribing and aesthetics, she founded The British Nursing Alliance with Dr Kevin Corbett and was brought up against the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) for speaking out against the fraud of the lock down and infection, and which is incumbent upon all nurses and so she was fulfilling her duty and obligation to ensure patient safety. I first learned about the Behavioural Insights Team when watching the first gathering of people in London, who stood up and denounced the UK Governments lock down and other issues around our rights and freedoms, masks, the pending injectable, and much more. I am unable to find any video of this event and consider it to have been censored and removed 'to protect the public'.
There are many more people who have stood up, taken the matter of saving the population from the genocide that has rolled out these past two years. Mark Sexton, Mark Steele, David Clews, Professor Delores Cahill, Dr Sam White, Hannah Rose law to name a few - for me I am eternally grateful, from the depth of my soul, to each of the named and unnamed men and women who brought knowledge, empowerment and reminded me of informed consent and choice.
The above have provided substantial evidence that the covid 19 pandemic was nothing more than a PCR test pandemic, or a plandemic. On the UK Government website the following has been copied and shared:
"The Government stated:
As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) in the UK. The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak.
The statement goes on to explain that Covid-19 no longer meets all the criteria, given that among other things, there is now “greater clinical awareness” and a specific laboratory test.
Other considerations
The Government spokesperson went on to explain:
HCID is partly based on individual risk. The decision to introduce our social distancing measures such as closing pubs, restaurants and other businesses is an epidemiological one – based on the virus’ activities at a population level and not the individual level.
The four nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak.
Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.
The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.
The need to have a national, coordinated response remains. In the UK, a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) is defined according to the following criteria: – acute infectious disease – typically has a high case-fatality rate – may not have effective prophylaxis or treatment – often difficult to recognise and detect rapidly – ability to spread in the community and within healthcare settings – requires an enhanced individual, population and system response to ensure it is managed effectively, efficiently and safely"
The meat of the matter
So I ask myself 'Why then, did Johnson, Whitty, Hancock et al, continue with lock down and all the propaganda thereafter"? Seemingly there is no answer other unless you are a 'conspiracy theorist'! It would appear that patients, removed from hospital were euthanised as part of a Liverpool Pathway of 'Care'; euthanised without consent and effectively murdered - you will find a lot about the midazolam and morphine murders. The Liverpool pathway was removed and ceased years earlier as it is simply a pathway of euthanasia otherwise in my own mind, murder of the most vulnerable. Recently Kate Shemirani released a video outlining the continued risk to our elders and the vulnerable (https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all# )
Uk Column News brought to my attention a meeting that took place in Chatham House and a presentation given by Professor Van Ranst - rebranding flu! Link below to video, be quick in case it is taken down! Van Ranst shares his experience of Swine flu and how he manipulated media and people but those 'anit-vaxxers...'
We have been manipulated by unethical psychologists, pathological narcissistic/psychopathic politicians and unquestioning police and 'enforcement officers' who were enforcing covid-19 guidelines, as though they were rules of law, which require the consent of the governed (Theresa May). Recently 'Celerity' Matt Hancock confirmed that it was guidance - yet still the NHS policy was practiced as though that guidance was law.
The ushering in of the vax pass added to the sense that guidance was law and it was found to be a backdoor for US Military to access private information and censor the individual. The track and trace was another part of the scam which was part of the vax pass - people willing shared their private medical information with anyone who asked.
We have all seen the above individual in a 'romantic clinch' and Johnson and others partying when people were under lock down rules that was meant to prevent the spread of the virus that had never been isolated! Even the Queen, now deceased, had to attend her own husbands funeral without family - how many families have been ripped apart at a time when they needed to be connected and all in the name of a fraud upon us all?
And this is the crux of the matter - the pandemic was, and is, a fraud; the corona virus committee proved the PRC test, pivotal to the notion of cases. The FDA removed its authorisation for use of the PCR deeming the test dangerous. To date, in the UK, there are no hazard warnings on PCR packaging, no hazard warning issued by the MHRA, the Health and Safety executive, trading standards and advertising standards agency, have not made an announcement or raised issue of hazard of PCR tests.
There is also the matter of a safe and effective treatment having always been available but denied to patients. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin are proven effective along with nutritional supplements. Herbal and Homoeopathic medicines also offer safe treatment but were not even considered by those responsible for health and social care in the UK. Indeed Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer, claimed hydroxychlorine to be unsafe after several patients were given dosages some twelve times the safe prescribing dosage level. That dosage level is a deadly dose and that requires investigation by the Police - don't hold your breath on that one though as the system is defunct and protection of criminals is paramount!
The continued mask wearing, covid 19 vaccination, use of hand gels, the distancing, and more recently the 'pandemic amnesty' all provide a clue to the way the applied psychology has been affective - and just remember when was consent to such treatment garnered? I do not recall ever being asked to consent to behavioural modification and conditioning.
Yellow Card Scheme
This is a system of gathering data on medical and devices harms, injuries and losses. The MHRA is responsible for collecting, collating, interpreting data and addressing harms and raising alerts of risk. The people responsible for the MHRA have failed immensely in their duty of care and duty of candour. This would seem nothing new to the MHRA as found in the failings of primodos, valproate and mesh, the blood products that led to HIV/AIDS in haemophiliacs, and more recently the injury and death arising internationally, from Covid 19 vaccines.
The mind bending mixed messaging of 'rules, guidelines, legislation, law from Johnson, Whitty, Van Tam, Hancock and many others has been recorded to time immemorial including the advertising posters that compelled people to go and get the injection. There is so much more can be added to this blog post, however I will cease at this point. Please add your own comment if you wish.
The conclusion
In my mind the answer to the question 'Is a pandemic preparedness treaty necessary?' My response is simply no. The treaty would be founded on lies, deception and manipulation. That a treaty is simply a deeper power grab by Tedros, Scwab, Gates and others whose main driver is to steal property and control people.
Here in the United Kingdom of Great Britain there are Superior Statute that can never be repealed. However there is a Supreme Court ruling that confirms Common Law and Equity as the main stay of our law. And finally the current illegal and illegitimate Government of both [Communist] Conservative & Labour parties have not the mind, heart and will of the people, without which the Ministers have no legitimate power.
Suggestion
As you are reading this blog will realise you have experienced the affects of this crime against each of us through harm, loss or injury of one sort or another. My injury and harm was isolation, fear and then shock as I witnessed my grand-daughter terrified to come near me as she might kill me! Thank God I held knowledge of the immune system and was able to use drama and art to explain to her the power of immunity. She was upset at the lies from Johnson and his Government. But again through drama, art and additionally the use of Hebrew scripture we were able to forgive and bless, and then enjoy life again. Art ,drama, nature and scripture offer a medicinal remedy to cure the soul and ease the Spirit; if you do not use them already the do try them out. You will be marvelled by the result.
"For God has not given us a Spirit of fear but of power and of love and a sound mind"
2 Timothy 1:7
References and links (not complete):
First do no harm; Baroness Cumberledge Report, https://www.immdsreview.org.uk/Report.html
Dolan, S (2020) Join the Legal Challenge to the UK Govt Lockdown https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/lockdownlegalchallenge/
UK Column News; https://www.ukcolumn.org/
Fuellmich, R (2022) https://totalityofevidence.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich/
Shemirani, K - British Nursing Alliance https://t.me/BritishNursingAllianceSpeak
Van Ranst, P ( ) https://youtu.be/5ANOVSjDUd4
Government down grade of CV-19 https://onthewight.com/why-covid-19-was-downgraded-from-high-consequence-infectious-disease-hcid-classification-the-reasons-and-understanding-them/